Sweelinck Organ Works – Vogel and Kelemen

SWEELINCK Organ Works – Vol. 1 (Harald Vogel) / Organ Works (Joseph Kelemen)

Jan Pieterszoon Sweelinck (1562-1621)

Harald Vogel (organ); Joseph Kelemen (organ)

MDG 914 1690-6 / OEHMS OC 680 (78:42 / 75:44)


Amsterdam in 1600 must have smelled of herring and wet stone, and somewhere under the vaulted brick of the Oude Kerk, a man was teaching an entire nation how a set of newly minted psalm tunes should go. That man is the whole subject of this disc, and Harald Vogel — who has spent the better part of fifty years thinking about north German and Dutch organs the way other people think about their own children — plays as though he still hears the marketplace murmuring outside the doors.

Sweelinck never heard his music called early Baroque, or late Renaissance, or anything at all tidy. He sits at a hinge point: the polyphonic ricercar tradition of Italy filtering through his ears (he’d absorbed plenty of Andrea Gabrieli and the Venetians without ever crossing the Alps, so far as we know), crossed with something specifically Netherlandish — a taste for figuration that spins and spins. He was the “maker of German organists,” they used to say; Scheidt and Praetorius’s generation trooped through Amsterdam to learn at his feet.

Vogel opens with the Toccata ex d, SwWV 285, all toccata-fingers and no fuss — the piece barely gets going before it’s over, and that’s exactly right; these North Sea toccatas aren’t Frescobaldi’s expansive Roman essays, they’re compact, almost curt gestures, throat-clearings before the real business. The Echo-Fantasia that follows is where things get interesting, acoustically speaking. Echo technique on a historic organ isn’t a studio trick — it depends on physically separated divisions, on the ears catching a phrase lobbed from one case to another across a stone nave. You can hear Vogel relishing this, letting the silences between statement and echo breathe a beat longer than you’d expect. Some performers rush the joke. He doesn’t.

The two settings of Psalm 116 are the emotional and historical crux of the whole program. First comes the plain congregational tune as harmonized by Claude Goudimel — barely a minute, almost throwaway — and then Sweelinck’s own extended fantasia-variation on it, SwWV 313, unspooling for nearly seven minutes. Hearing them back to back does something no scholarly footnote quite manages: you understand, viscerally, what Sweelinck’s job actually was. He took a tune the Amsterdam public barely knew, freshly imported from Geneva by way of Calvinist reform, and made it familiar through sheer inventive repetition — decorating it, inverting it, letting it migrate through the voices — while merchants haggled somewhere behind him near the church doors on a Tuesday afternoon.

The big Fantasia à 4 ex a, at nearly fourteen minutes, is the intellectual heavyweight here, built from a single subject worked with patience. Vogel doesn’t hurry it, doesn’t try to manufacture excitement it doesn’t need. Trust the counterpoint, he seems to be saying. Let the lines do what lines do. Whether every listener has the stamina for fourteen minutes of that patience is a fair question; I confess my attention wandered once or twice on a second hearing, though never on the first.

“Erbarm dich mein o Herre Gott” gets a rendition of real gravity — thirteen minutes of chorale-based meditation that anticipates, in its seriousness if not its harmonic language, the north German chorale fantasias of the next century. You think forward to Buxtehude almost against your will.

Vogel’s registrations are drawn from his knowledge of surviving historic instruments — organ contracts, visitation reports, the scholarly apparatus he helped build over a lifetime of fieldwork in northern Europe. The inclusion of a spoken demonstration of the organ’s stops is a small, generous touch; not every listener wants a lecture, but for those curious about why a Prestant sounds the way it does, or what a Sesquialtera actually contributes to a cantus firmus line, it’s invaluable, and it never feels like padding.

Does this displace Ton Koopman’s pioneering Sweelinck cycle, or the more recent work of Vogel’s own former student Joseph Kelemen? Not exactly — these aren’t really in competition so much as complementary witnesses. Koopman brings more overt theatrical flair; Vogel brings four decades of organ archaeology and an unhurried scholarly conscience. I know which one I’d want playing at my own funeral, and which one I’d want teaching my students.

A rewarding disc, then, occasionally demanding, never showy.

Profile photo of Thomas Fasano
Tom Fasano has been writing reviews of classical music recordings for the past quarter century. He's finally making them public on this blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *